Back to results

Invermay vs Moonah — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Invermay

    TAS · 7248
    46Average
    Median
    $525k
    5y growth
    6.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

  2. Moonah

    TAS · 7009
    47Average
    Median
    $685k
    5y growth
    7.4%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Invermay
Moonah
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
686.8%/yr
747.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
562.8%
502.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
551.8%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
3$0.2bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4242% under cap
2424% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
60-2.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Invermay

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Construction pipeline
    • Affordability

  2. Moonah

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Supply tightening

Why Invermay

Stable entry · room to scale

6.8%/yr capital growth, 2.8% gross yield. Plenty of room under your cap if you want to stretch.

Drivers
  • Capital growth6.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-2.0% YoY
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus0.3 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Moonah

Stable entry point

7.4%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.4%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Royal Hobart Hospital — Stage 34.5 kmConstruction · 2026