Back to results

Larrakeyah vs Farrar — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Larrakeyah

    NT · 0820
    36Below trend
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    3.4%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

  2. Farrar

    NT · 0830
    50Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    6.2%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Larrakeyah
Farrar
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
343.4%/yr
626.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
492.4%
733.7%
Rental demand
weight 10%
382.5%
502.0%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
717.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
4812.0%
5614.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
66% under cap
2828% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
500.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Larrakeyah

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Farrar

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Larrakeyah

Stable but fully priced

population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (94% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.4%)

Why Farrar

Stable entry point

3.7% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield3.7%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
  • Capital growth6.2%/yr
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state