Back to results

Moe vs Selby — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Moe

    VIC · 3825
    57Average
    Median
    $339k
    5y growth
    10.1%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Selby

    VIC · 3159
    54Average
    Median
    $870k
    5y growth
    7.7%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Moe
Selby
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.1%/yr
777.7%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
613.1%
482.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
6262% under cap
33% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
25+5.0% YoY
80-6.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Moe

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Selby

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Moe

Stable entry · room to scale

10.1%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.1%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Budget headroom62% under cap
  • Rental yield3.1%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Glen Waverley101.9 kmConstruction · 2035

Why Selby

Stable but fully priced

listings tightening 6.0% YoY, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Capital growth7.7%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • At top of budget (97% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.4%)

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Glen Waverley18.3 kmConstruction · 2035