Back to results

Mowbray vs Warrane — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Mowbray

    TAS · 7248
    46Average
    Median
    $495k
    5y growth
    6.6%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

  2. Warrane

    TAS · 7018
    48Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Mowbray
Warrane
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
666.6%/yr
727.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
613.0%
482.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
551.8%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5614.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
1$0.0bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4545% under cap
2828% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
60-2.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Mowbray

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Construction pipeline
    • Affordability

  2. Warrane

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Mowbray

Stable entry · room to scale

6.6%/yr capital growth, 3.0% gross yield. Plenty of room under your cap if you want to stretch.

Drivers
  • Capital growth6.6%/yr
  • Rental yield3.0%
  • Supply tightening-2.0% YoY
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus1.3 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Warrane

Growth-led, low cashflow

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, 7.2%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.4%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Macquarie Point Stadium3.8 kmPlanned · 2029