Back to results

Noarlunga vs Port Adelaide — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Noarlunga

    SA · 5168
    64Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Port Adelaide

    SA · 5015
    57Average
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Noarlunga
Port Adelaide
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.8%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
884.4%
412.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
3939% under cap
1717% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Noarlunga

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Port Adelaide

    2/8
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Noarlunga

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, 4.4% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Rental yield4.4%
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Port Adelaide

Growth-led, low cashflow

10.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)
  • No major construction project in this state