Back to results

Parap vs Wanguri vs Coconut Grove — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Parap

    NT · 0820
    36Below trend
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    3.4%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced
  2. Wanguri

    NT · 0810
    45Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    4.8%/yr
    YieldStable entry point
  3. Coconut Grove

    NT · 0810
    41Below trend
    Median
    $695k
    5y growth
    4.6%/yr
    BalancedGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Parap
Wanguri
Coconut Grove
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
343.4%/yr
484.8%/yr
464.6%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
512.6%
723.6%
452.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
382.5%
452.2%
452.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
717.1%
717.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
4812.0%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0
0
0
Affordability
weight 8%
66% under cap
3434% under cap
2323% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
45+1.0% YoY
45+1.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Parap

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Wanguri

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability
  3. Coconut Grove

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Parap

Stable but fully priced

population +7.1% (5y), 2.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (94% of cap)
  • Modest 5y growth (3.4%/yr)

Why Wanguri

Stable entry point

3.6% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield3.6%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Coconut Grove

Growth-led, low cashflow

population +7.1% (5y), incomes +13.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.2%)
  • No major construction project in this state