Back to results

Rosetta vs Glenorchy — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Rosetta

    TAS · 7010
    48Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    7.4%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Glenorchy

    TAS · 7010
    47Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Rosetta
Glenorchy
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
747.4%/yr
727.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
562.8%
522.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2828% under cap
2828% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Rosetta

    2/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield

  2. Glenorchy

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Rosetta

Stable entry point

7.4%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.4%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Royal Hobart Hospital — Stage 38.6 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Glenorchy

Stable entry point

7.2%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Royal Hobart Hospital — Stage 36.4 kmConstruction · 2026