Back to results

Rosetta vs Mowbray — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Rosetta

    TAS · 7010
    48Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    7.4%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Mowbray

    TAS · 7248
    46Average
    Median
    $495k
    5y growth
    6.6%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Rosetta
Mowbray
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
747.4%/yr
666.6%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
562.8%
613.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
551.8%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
1$0.0bn
Affordability
weight 8%
2828% under cap
4545% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
60-2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Rosetta

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Supply tightening

  2. Mowbray

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Construction pipeline
    • Affordability

Why Rosetta

Stable entry point

7.4%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.4%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Royal Hobart Hospital — Stage 38.6 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Mowbray

Stable entry · room to scale

6.6%/yr capital growth, 3.0% gross yield. Plenty of room under your cap if you want to stretch.

Drivers
  • Capital growth6.6%/yr
  • Rental yield3.0%
  • Supply tightening-2.0% YoY
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus1.3 kmRecently completed · 2024