Back to results

Springfield Lakes vs Redlynch — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Springfield Lakes

    QLD · 4300
    65Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    13.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Redlynch

    QLD · 4870
    54Average
    Median
    $700k
    5y growth
    8.5%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Springfield Lakes
Redlynch
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10013.5%/yr
858.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
572.9%
653.3%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
452.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
7218.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1717% under cap
2222% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
30+4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Springfield Lakes

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Redlynch

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Springfield Lakes

Stable entry point

13.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth13.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road22.7 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Redlynch

Stable entry point

population +10.0% (5y), 8.5%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Capital growth8.5%/yr
  • Rental yield3.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street1393.0 kmConstruction · 2026