Back to results

Wanguri vs Leanyer — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Wanguri

    NT · 0810
    45Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    4.8%/yr
    YieldStable entry point

  2. Leanyer

    NT · 0812
    44Below trend
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    4.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Wanguri
Leanyer
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
484.8%/yr
484.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
723.6%
643.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
452.2%
452.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
717.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
3434% under cap
2828% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
45+1.0% YoY
45+1.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Wanguri

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Leanyer

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Wanguri

Stable entry point

3.6% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield3.6%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Leanyer

Stable entry point

population +7.1% (5y), 3.2% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.2%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state