Zuccoli vs Lyons vs Wanguri — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

Zuccoli
NT · 0832
50Average
Median
$695k
5y growth
6.2%/yr
YieldStable entry point
Lyons
NT · 0810
39Below trend
Median
$745k
5y growth
4.6%/yr
BalancedGrowth-led, low cashflow
Wanguri
NT · 0810
45Average
Median
$595k
5y growth
4.8%/yr
YieldStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight

Zuccoli

Lyons

Wanguri

Capital growth (5y)

weight 22%

626.2%/yr

464.6%/yr

484.8%/yr

Rental yield

weight 13%

824.1%

371.8%

723.6%

Rental demand

weight 10%

502.0%

452.2%

Population growth

weight 12%

717.1%

Income growth

weight 12%

5614.0%

5213.0%

Construction pipeline

weight 15%

0–

Affordability

weight 8%

2323% under cap

1717% under cap

3434% under cap

Supply tightening

weight 8%

500.0% YoY

45+1.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

Zuccoli
5/8
- Capital growth (5y)
- Rental yield
- Rental demand
- Income growth
- Supply tightening
Lyons
0/8
No outright lead on any single dimension.
Wanguri
1/8
- Affordability

Why Zuccoli

Stable entry point

4.1% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers

Rental yield4.1%
Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Capital growth6.2%/yr

Risks

No major construction project in this state

Why Lyons

Growth-led, low cashflow

population +7.1% (5y), incomes +13.0% (5y).

Drivers

Population growth+7.1% (5y)

Risks

Thin gross yield (1.8%)
No major construction project in this state

Why Wanguri

Stable entry point

3.6% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers

Rental yield3.6%
Population growth+7.1% (5y)

Risks

No major construction project in this state