Back to results

Blackett vs Noarlunga — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Blackett

    NSW · 2770
    44Below trend
    Median
    $868k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

  2. Noarlunga

    SA · 5168
    64Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Blackett
Noarlunga
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
371.9%
884.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
44% under cap
3939% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Blackett

    3/8
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Noarlunga

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Affordability

Why Blackett

Stable but fully priced

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, tight 1.3% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
  • Income growth+16.0% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (96% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.9%)

Construction ·M12 Motorway14.3 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Noarlunga

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, 4.4% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Rental yield4.4%
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state