Back to results

Braybrook vs Salisbury — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Braybrook

    VIC · 3019
    51Average
    Median
    $715k
    5y growth
    2.0%/yr
    BalancedLate-cycle hold

  2. Salisbury

    SA · 5108
    59Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Braybrook
Salisbury
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
202.0%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
452.3%
502.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
8421.0%
5614.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
42$2.1bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2121% under cap
3939% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Braybrook

    4/8
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

  2. Salisbury

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Braybrook

Late-cycle hold

listings tightening 7.0% YoY, incomes +21.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+21.0% (5y)
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.3%)
  • Modest 5y growth (2.0%/yr)

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub2.3 kmApproved · 2033

Why Salisbury

Growth-led, low cashflow

10.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.5%)
  • No major construction project in this state