Bridgewater vs Wodonga — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

Bridgewater
TAS · 7030
54Average
Median
$495k
5y growth
8.4%/yr
GrowthStable entry · room to scale
Wodonga
VIC · 3689
63Strong
Median
$485k
5y growth
7.9%/yr
BalancedStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight

Bridgewater

Wodonga

Capital growth (5y)

weight 22%

848.4%/yr

797.9%/yr

Rental yield

weight 13%

552.7%

603.0%

Rental demand

weight 10%

681.3%

701.2%

Population growth

weight 12%

313.1%

787.8%

Income growth

weight 12%

5213.0%

8822.0%

Construction pipeline

weight 15%

16$0.8bn

0–

Affordability

weight 8%

4545% under cap

4646% under cap

Supply tightening

weight 8%

70-4.0% YoY

90-8.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

Bridgewater
2/8
- Capital growth (5y)
- Construction pipeline
Wodonga
6/8
- Rental yield
- Rental demand
- Population growth
- Income growth
- Affordability
- Supply tightening

Why Bridgewater

Stable entry · room to scale

8.4%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY. Plenty of room under your cap if you want to stretch.

Drivers

Capital growth8.4%/yr
Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Tight rentals1.3%

Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·New Bridgewater Bridge0.0 kmConstruction · 2025

Why Wodonga

Stable entry · room to scale

listings tightening 8.0% YoY, incomes +22.0% (5y).

Drivers

Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
Income growth+22.0% (5y)
Capital growth7.9%/yr
Population growth+7.8% (5y)

Risks

No major construction project in this state

Construction ·North East Link — Bulleen243.4 kmConstruction · 2028