Back to results

Geebung vs Munno Para — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Geebung

    QLD · 4034
    65Strong
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Munno Para

    SA · 5115
    60Strong
    Median
    $495k
    5y growth
    11.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Geebung
Munno Para
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10011.8%/yr
10011.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
512.6%
562.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
731.1%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
7619.0%
5614.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
66% under cap
4545% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
90-8.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Geebung

    4/8
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Munno Para

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Geebung

Stable but fully priced

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (94% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street12.6 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Munno Para

Stable entry · room to scale

11.2%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state