Back to results

Gunn vs Noarlunga — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Gunn

    NT · 0832
    49Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    5.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Noarlunga

    SA · 5168
    64Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Gunn
Noarlunga
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
585.8%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
773.9%
884.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
5614.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2828% under cap
3939% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
500.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Gunn

    1/8
    • Population growth

  2. Noarlunga

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Gunn

Stable entry point

3.9% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield3.9%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Noarlunga

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, 4.4% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Rental yield4.4%
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state