Back to results

Hillvue vs Lethbridge Park — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Hillvue

    NSW · 2340
    47Average
    Median
    $725k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Lethbridge Park

    NSW · 2770
    44Below trend
    Median
    $890k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Hillvue
Lethbridge Park
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
502.5%
351.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1919% under cap
11% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Hillvue

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Lethbridge Park

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Hillvue

Stable entry point

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, tight 1.3% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
  • Income growth+16.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Parramatta299.3 kmConstruction · 2030

Why Lethbridge Park

Stable but fully priced

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, tight 1.3% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
  • Income growth+16.0% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.8%)

Construction ·M12 Motorway14.3 kmConstruction · 2026