Back to results

Kings Meadows vs Tuart Hill — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Kings Meadows

    TAS · 7249
    45Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    6.2%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Tuart Hill

    WA · 6060
    63Strong
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Kings Meadows
Tuart Hill
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
626.2%/yr
989.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
603.0%
392.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
551.8%
751.0%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
3939% under cap
66% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
60-2.0% YoY
95-9.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Kings Meadows

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Tuart Hill

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Kings Meadows

Stable entry point

6.2%/yr capital growth, 3.0% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth6.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-2.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus6.4 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Tuart Hill

Stable but fully priced

population +12.6% (5y), 9.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-9.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.0%
Risks
  • At top of budget (94% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)