Back to results

Marion vs Springfield Lakes — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Marion

    SA · 5043
    54Average
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    9.2%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Springfield Lakes

    QLD · 4300
    65Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    13.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Marion
Springfield Lakes
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
929.2%/yr
10013.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
442.2%
572.9%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
66% under cap
1717% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Marion

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Springfield Lakes

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Marion

Stable but fully priced

9.2%/yr capital growth, tight 1.2% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.2%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (94% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.2%)

Why Springfield Lakes

Stable entry point

13.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth13.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road22.7 kmConstruction · 2026