Back to results

Midway Point vs Joondalup — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Midway Point

    TAS · 7171
    48Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    7.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Joondalup

    WA · 6027
    62Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Midway Point
Joondalup
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
707.0%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
603.0%
502.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2828% under cap
1717% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Midway Point

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Joondalup

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth

Why Midway Point

Stable entry point

7.0%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.0%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Macquarie Point Stadium18.6 kmPlanned · 2029

Why Joondalup

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state