Back to results

Port Adelaide vs Ellenbrook — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Port Adelaide

    SA · 5015
    57Average
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Ellenbrook

    WA · 6069
    65Strong
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Port Adelaide
Ellenbrook
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.8%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
412.0%
613.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1717% under cap
3434% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Port Adelaide

    1/8
    • Supply tightening

  2. Ellenbrook

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

Why Port Adelaide

Growth-led, low cashflow

10.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Ellenbrook

Stable entry point

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state