Back to results

West Tamworth vs Elizabeth — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. West Tamworth

    NSW · 2340
    50Average
    Median
    $500k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

  2. Elizabeth

    SA · 5112
    60Strong
    Median
    $445k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
West Tamworth
Elizabeth
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
572.9%
542.7%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
5614.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4444% under cap
5151% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. West Tamworth

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth
    • Income growth

  2. Elizabeth

    2/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Affordability

Why West Tamworth

Stable entry · room to scale

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, tight 1.3% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
  • Income growth+16.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Parramatta302.0 kmConstruction · 2030

Why Elizabeth

Stable entry · room to scale

11.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state